ARVES Chess Endgamestudy Association.
Search
≡
Open menu
Home
News
Latest News
Tournament Calendar
Awards
tournament results
Awards Files
Awards replayable
registered users see more
Endgame Studies
Miniatures
Malyutkas
Pawns only
Pawns against others
Knights and Pawns
Knight against Bishop
Knight against Rook
Knight against Queen
Two Knights
Bishops and Pawns
Bishop against Knight
Bishop against Rook
Bishop + Knight others
Bishop against Queen
Two Bishops
Rooks and Pawns
Rook against Knight
Rook against Bishop
Rooks against Queen
Rook + Knight others
Rook + Bishop others
Two Rooks
Queens and Pawns
Queen against Rooks
Queen against others
Training
Study of the year
Study of the year 2015
Study of the year 2014
Study of the year 2013
Study of the year 2012
Study of the year 2010
Studies of the years 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011
Studies by theme
sample cql-files
Albino pawn
Allumwandlung - all promotions
Bristol theme
Castling
Caterpillar - Triple pawns
Chameleon Echo stalemates
Cross check
Doublechecks
Double Excelsior
Duras theme
Excelsior theme
Festina Lente
Fortress
Grimshaw
Ideal Mirror mate
Indian theme
Knight chases other Knight
Knight visits at least twenty different squares.
Kozirev alikes
Loman's move
Miniatures
Mirror mate
Mutual zugzwangs 5-Pieces
Nowotny
Obtrusive bishop
Passed pawn search
Pinned mate
Plachutta
Prokes Manoeuvre
Queen staircase
Rambling Rook
Rook traverses a rectangle
Rook visits each corner
Samecolor Bishops
Troitzky's ending
Unguarded Guard
Valladeo theme
Zwickmuhle / Torre-Lasker theme
Studies by Composer
registered users see more
Instructive studies
Endgamestudy Presentations on Video
Theory
Glossary
Terminology
What is an Endgamestudy?
A minor dual is not a big deal
How to Compose?
Endgame Tablebases
check a 7-men position
GBR code
Hall of Fame
Composers by Alphabet
Composers by Country
Composers by Production Total
Composers by Timeline
Composers born to 1900
Composers born 1900-1932
Composers born >=1933
Babson Task
First Prizes
First prizes 2020
Alexander Rueb
Collections
magazines
Magazine EG
EG issues 215 - 226
PDFs to download
EG issues 191 - 214
PDFs to download
EG issues 1 - 190
PDFs to download
EG index
EG Quality Controls
Magyar Sakkvilag 2020
Finals and themes
Argentina magazine
Finales Y Temas
articles PDF
Finales Y Temas 143
Finales Y Temas 142
Finales Y Temas 141
Finales Y Temas 140
Problem Forum
German magazine
Problem Forum
all
Problem Forum 75
Problem Forum 74
Problem Forum 73
Problem Forum 72
Problem Forum 71
Problem Forum 70
Problem Forum 69
Problem Forum 68
Problem Forum 67
Problem Forum 66
Problem Forum 65
Problem Forum 64
Harold van der Heijden Database
Harold van der Heijden Database Sources
Chess Query Language 6
Endgame Study Database
over 25000 studies to find
Authors and Books
Book: An Introduction to Chess Endgame Studies
Book: Exploration of Study-Composition
Book: Anthology of miniature Endgame Studies
Book: A Book of Bedtime Pawn Endings
Book: The Lubyanka Gambit
Book: The Pawn Study Composer's Manual, Mikhail Zinar
Book: Weltenfern, Siegfried Hornecker
Rozentalis Endgame Book
Kling and Horwitz
Websites
links to others
Downloads
registered users only
British Endgame Study News
British Endgame Study News 1996 (March)
British Endgame Study News 1996 (June)
BESN article about: K+R+B vs K+R
Studies Richard Réti by John Beasley
Book: Depth and Beauty, Artur Mandler, John Beasley
Reciprocal zugzwangs up to six men
Cyclic Zugzwangs
Articles various
Babson Task by Gady Costeff
Ceskoslovensky Sach 2025
Endgame Studies in Training
Inspiration for Study Composers I
Inspiration for Study Composers II
Martin Minski in Schach
Motiefgroep Chess - Collectors
About
Welcome
What We Try To Achieve
What We Do
EG
Agenda
Solving Contests
Arves Solving contests statistics
Arves 10th solving Ty 2019
Arves 9th Solving Ty 2018
Arves 8th Solving Ty 2017
Arves 7th Solving Ty 2016
Tata Solvingcontest 2015
Tata Solvingcontest 2013
Tata Solvingcontest 2012
Tata 2nd Solvingcontest 2011
Who We Are
Board
Become a Member
Photo Gallery
Login or Register
Archive
Paul Valois
Endgames Instructions on YouTube
Chess Query Language 3.02
Introduction
How to Install CQL?
How to run CQL?
CQL Syntactic conventions
CQL Matching games
CQL Matching positions
CQL Finding pairs of positions: The relation list
CQL Tagging: keeping track of piece identity
Downloading CQL
Frequently Asked Questions
CQL Documentation
Magazine EBUR
EBUR-index
Arves Books
Corrections by Peter Krug
Peter Krug meets Martin Minski
Dutch
Alexander Rueb
Oploswedstrijd 2019
Oploswedstrijd 2016
Oploswedstrijd 2011
Oploswedstrijd 2010
Oploswedstrijd 2009
Oploswedstrijd 2008
Oploswedstrijd 2007
Oploswedstrijd 2006
Oploswedstrijd 2004
Oploswedstrijd 2003
Oploswedstrijd 2002
Oploswedstrijd 2001
Historie ARVES
Studies awarded for the
Variantim 2025
or
Israeli Ring
tournament 2025.
[Event "1-3.p Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Yehuda Hoch"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "5k1q/1p6/p6p/p3P2P/3N4/K7/8/3R4 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "33"] {Variantim 2025 – Preliminary award I received 31 studies from Gady Costeff. Most were of moderate level or higher, with some reaching a high standard. In evaluating and ranking the studies, I followed several general principles. In my opinion, it is nowadays very difficult, perhaps even impossible, to compose a study in which no similar final position or idea has appeared before. However, when a theme has been seen frequently in studies or in practical play, this has a negative impact on the evaluation. At the same time, I attached particular importance to surprising moves and ideas, especially those that are counterintuitive from the perspective of a regular chess player. I also favored studies with good flow, where the play develops in a logical and harmonious way. For example, although underpromotions to a bishop or rook are known in studies, they remain rare in practical play and should be judged in their specific context. I gave preference to compositions with relatively rare ideas, even if not entirely original, as well as to economical settings. I was less impressed by studies whose main idea is unclear and perhaps understandable only with computer assistance, as is sometimes the case in modern tablebase-based studies. If a piece in the initial position serves no purpose other than to be captured, i.e., it does not make a single move, this detracts from the evaluation, although it does not disqualify the study. Conversely, I gave additional credit to studies in which all pieces play an active role. Out of the 31 studies, I awarded 19, including 7 Special Commendations. While these were somewhat less impressive than the main award winners, I nevertheless considered them worthy of distinction. I have commented on all awarded studies, indicating the main reasons for my evaluation. Three compositions stood out above the others. The three studies are of very similar overall quality, with only slight differences between them. Accordingly, I decided to award the First Prize, which includes a monetary award, jointly to all three compositions. Some studies were anticipated: 4594 and 4595 are anticipated by Tarasiuk, The Problemist, 2016–2017. 4484 is anticipated by Timman, Garcia-75, 2023. Finally, I would like to thank Gady Costeff once again for organizing the tournament and for providing helpful information regarding possible anticipations. I also thank all the composers who submitted their studies; their efforts made the judging both interesting and enjoyable. Michael Pasman Meitar, Israel 20/3/2026} 1.Nc6 $1 ( 1.Ne6+ Ke7 2.Rd8 Qxd8 3.Nxd8 Kxd8 $19 ) ( 1.Ka2 ) 1...bxc6 ( 1...Kf7 2.Rd8 Qg7 3.Rd7+ $10 ) 2.Rd8+ Kg7 3.Rd7+ ( 3.Rxh8 Kxh8 4.Ka4 Kg7 5.Kxa5 c5 6.Kb6 c4 7.Kc7 c3 $19 ) 3...Kg8 4.Rd8+ Kh7 5.Rd7+ Qg7 6.e6 Kh8 7.Rd8+ Kh7 8.Rd7 c5 9.Ka4 ( 9.e7 Qc3+ ) ( 9.Kb3 Kh8 10.e7 Qg3+ 11.Kc2 Qg2+ 12.Kc1 Qg5+ 13.Kb2 Qe5+ 14.Ka3 Kg8 $19 ) 9...c4 10.Kxa5 $3 ( 10.Ka3 c3 11.Kb3 Kh8 12.e7 Qg8+ 13.Kc2 Qg2+ 14.Kb3 Qb2+ 15.Kc4 Qb5+ ) 10...c3 11.Kb6 $1 ( 11.e7 Qe5+ $19 ) 11...c2 12.e7 $1 Qf6+ ( 12...c1=Q 13.e8=Q Qb2+ 14.Kxa6 $10 ) 13.Ka7 ( 13.Kb7 Qf3+ 14.Kb8 Qf4+ 15.Ka7 Qe3+ 16.Kxa6 Kg8 $19 ) 13...Qf2+ 14.Ka8 $1 Qf3+ 15.Rb7 $1 c1=Q 16.e8=Q+ Qc7 17.Qg6+ $10 {with perpetual check. Creative play by both sides, featuring ideas that are not common. White finds a way to win the black queen, but refrains from capturing it until the very end. He even allows Black to promote a second queen. The white king marches all the way from a3 to a8, White promotes a queen himself, and then achieves a draw by perpetual check.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "1-3.p Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Yochanan Afek"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "8/8/P7/1Pk4r/8/N1K5/5n2/B7 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "19"] 1.a7 Rh8 ( {2nd main line:} 1...Rh3+ 2.Kb2 Nd3+ 3.Kb1 $1 Rh1+ 4.Ka2 $1 {with 2 echo variations:} ( 4.Kc2 Rh2+ 5.Kb1 Rh1+ 6.Ka2 {is loss of time.} ) 4...Nb4+ ( 4...Rh2+ 5.Bb2 $1 {1st Bishop sacrifice} 5...Rxb2+ 6.Ka1 $18 ) 5.Kb3 Rh3+ 6.Bc3 $1 {2nd Bishop sacrifice} 6...Rxc3+ $1 7.Kb2 $1 $18 ) 2.Kb3 $1 ( 2.Kc2 $2 Rc8 $1 $11 ) 2...Rg8 $1 3.Be5 $1 ( 3.Bd4+ $2 Kxd4 4.b6 Ne4 5.Kb4 Nc5 6.Nb5+ Kd5 $10 ) 3...Ra8 4.Bd4+ $1 {the 3rd bishop sacrifice!} 4...Kxd4 5.b6 Nd3 ( 5...Ne4 6.Nb5+ {proceeds similarly.} ) 6.Nb5+ Kd5 ( 6...Ke5 7.Nc7 Rd8 8.Na6 {wins} ) 7.b7 $3 ( 7.Nc7+ Kc6 8.Nxa8 Nc5+ 9.Kc4 Nd7 $10 ) 7...Nc5+ 8.Kc2 $3 ( 8.Ka2 Rxa7+ $11 ) ( 8.Kb2 Nxb7 9.Nc7+ Kc6 10.Nxa8 Nd6 11.Nb6 Nc4+ $1 12.Nxc4 Kb7 $11 ) ( 8.Kc3 Nxb7 9.Nc7+ Kc6 10.Nxa8 Nc5 11.Nb6 Na4+ 12.Nxa4 Kb7 $11 ) 8...Nxb7 9.Nc7+ Kc6 10.Nxa8 {Economical starting position, 2 interesting main lines, One with 2 echo bishop sacrifices, bishop must be sacrificed correctly, second main line with another bishop sacrifice} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "1-3.p Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Daniel Gatti & Martin Minski"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2024"] [FEN "4b3/3P2P1/8/4N3/1R6/P5k1/q1r5/4K1B1 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "27"] 1.Rg4+ $1 ( {logical try} 1.g8=Q+ $2 Qxg8 2.d8=Q Rc1+ 3.Kd2 Rd1+ $1 4.Kxd1 Bh5+ $11 ) 1...Kh3 2.Rh4+ $1 Kg3 3.g8=Q+ $1 Qxg8 4.d8=Q Rc1+ 5.Kd2 Rd1+ $1 ( 5...Rc2+ 6.Ke3 Rc3+ 7.Kd4 $18 ) 6.Kxd1 Bh5+ 7.Rxh5 Qxd8+ 8.Ke2 Qe8 $1 ( 8...Qf8 9.a4 Qf6 10.a5 Qa6+ 11.Nd3 $18 ) 9.Rg5+ Kf4 10.Be3+ Ke4 11.Nc4 $1 ( {thematic try} 11.Ng4 $2 Qb5+ $1 12.Kf2 {e.g.} ( 12.Rxb5 {stalemate} ) 12...Qb2+ 13.Kg3 Qxa3 $11 ) ( {thematic try} 11.Nf3 $2 Qb5+ $1 12.Kf2 ( 12.Rxb5 {stalemate} ) 12...Qe2+ $1 13.Kxe2 {stalemate} ) ( {thematic try} 11.Nd3 $2 Qh5+ $1 12.Kd2 ( 12.Rxh5 {stalemate} ) 12...Qe2+ $1 13.Kxe2 {stalemate} ) 11...Qh5+ $1 ( {main} 11...Qb5 $1 12.Rc5 $3 {the point} ( 12.Rxb5 $2 {stalemate} ) ( 12.Rg4+ $2 Kd5 13.Rd4+ Kc5 14.Re4+ Kd5 15.Rd4+ Kc5 16.a4 Qxc4+ $1 17.Rxc4+ Kxc4 18.a5 Kb5 $11 ) 12...Qb2+ $1 13.Nd2+ {/Bd2+-} ( 13.Nxb2 $2 {Stalemate} ) ) 12.Kd2 $1 ( 12.Rxh5 $2 {stalemate} ) 12...Qe2+ $1 13.Kc3 $1 ( 13.Kxe2 $2 {stalemate} ) 13...Qd3+ 14.Kb4 $18 {Interesting battle avoiding stalemates, dynamic study, with all pieces moving . After nice sacrifices in introduction,logical + thematic tries and second main line on move 11 add value to the study.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "1.hm Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "P. Boll & V. Tarasiuk"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025.02.21"] [FEN "qk6/4p2P/8/3p1p1B/p1pP4/PpP5/1P4p1/1K6 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "18"] 1.h8=Q+ Ka7 2.Qg7 Qh8 $1 3.Qxe7+ $1 ( 3.Qxg2 Qxh5 4.Qxd5 Qd1# ) 3...Ka8 $1 4.Qg5 g1=Q+ 5.Qxg1 Qxh5 6.Ka1 $3 ( 6.Qg8+ Ka7 $1 7.Qg7+ Kb6 8.Qf6+ Kb5 $19 ) 6...Qe8 $1 ( 6...f4 7.Qg8+ Ka7 8.Qg7+ Kb6 9.Qg6+ $1 Qxg6 {stalemate} ) 7.Qh1 $1 Qg8 ( 7...Qe6 8.Qh8+ Ka7 9.Qh7+ Kb6 10.Qxf5 $1 Qxf5 {stalemate} ) 8.Qb1 $3 ( 8.Qe1 $2 f4 $19 ) 8...f4 ( 8...Qe6 9.Qxf5 $1 {stalemate} ) 9.Qg6 $1 Qxg6 {stalemate. A minor technical flaw is the capture of the unmoved bishop on h5, which appears unavoidable. This is nevertheless more than fully compensated by the striking and uncommon idea of Ka1!!, followed by the intermediate move Qh1! and then Qb1! (and later Qg6), in a seemingly simple position. The manoeuvre with the newly promoted white queen leads to an unavoidable queen sacrifice.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "2.hm Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "M.Gromov & O.Pervakov"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "8/7p/1N6/6n1/1r6/1k6/4B1p1/B3N1K1 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "21"] 1.Bd1+ $1 ( 1.Nd5 $2 Re4 2.Nc3 Re3 3.Bd1+ Kc4 4.Ne2 Nf3+ $1 5.Nxf3 Rxf3 6.Kxg2 Rd3 7.Bc2 Rd2 $11 ) 1...Ka2 2.Nd5 Nh3+ ( 2...Rb1 3.Bd4 $1 Nh3+ 4.Kh2 $3 g1=Q+ 5.Bxg1 Rxd1 6.Nc3+ Kb3 7.Nxd1 Nxg1 8.Kxg1 h5 9.Nf2 $1 h4 10.Nh3 $18 ) 3.Kxg2 Nf4+ $1 4.Nxf4 Rb1 5.Bc2 $1 Rxa1 6.Nfd3 $1 ( {Thematic try} 6.Ned3 h6 $3 {zz} 7.Nd5 h5 {zz} 8.Nc3+ Ka3 9.Nb1+ Ka2 10.Nd2 h4 {zz} 11.Kh2 h3 {zz} 12.Ba4 Ka3 13.Bc2 Ka2 $11 {Positional draw} ) 6...h5 ( 6...Ka3 7.Nf3 $1 Ra2 8.Nd4 h5 9.Nb5# {Model mate with selfblock} ) ( 6...h6 7.Kf2 h5 8.Ke2 h4 9.Kd2 h3 10.Kc3 $1 h2 11.Nb4+ Ka3 12.Bb3 $1 Rxe1 13.Nc2# ) 7.Nf3 $1 h4 8.Nd2 {zz} 8...h3+ 9.Kh2 {zz} 9...Ka3 10.Nc4+ Ka2 11.Nb4# {Model mate with selfblock. There are very similar ideas by Gromov himself in his studies from 1992 and 2006.. Composers addition of forwarding h-pawn with zugzwang and important thematic try 6.Ned3? which is replied by festina lente h6!!. But the unmoved a1 bishop, added just for to be captured by the black rook is a drawback} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "3.hm Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Michal Hlinka & Lubos Kekely"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2024"] [FEN "1n5k/5p1P/R7/1p4K1/4p3/7P/5n2/8 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "23"] 1.Rf6 $1 ( 1.Ra2 Nd3 $1 2.Kh6 Ne5 3.Ra1 $1 e3 $1 4.Ra7 Ned7 5.Rc7 Nf8 6.Rxf7 Nbd7 7.Rg7 Nf6 $11 ) ( 1.Ra7 Nxh3+ 2.Kh6 Nf2 $1 3.Rxf7 Ng4+ 4.Kg5 Nc6 $11 ) 1...Nxh3+ 2.Kh6 Ng5 $1 3.Kxg5 Kxh7 4.Kf4 $1 Kg8 ( 4...Kh8 5.Rd6 Kg7 6.Ke3 $1 {as main} ) 5.Rd6 Kg7 6.Ke3 $1 ( {logical try} 6.Kxe4 f5+ $1 7.Kd5 Kf7 8.Rd8 Na6 $11 ) 6...b4 7.Kxe4 f5+ ( 7...b3 8.Kd3 f5 9.Rb6 Nd7 10.Rb7 $18 {pin} ) 8.Kd5 $1 ( 8.Kxf5 $2 Kf7 $11 ) 8...Kf7 ( 8...f4 9.Rb6 f3 10.Rb7+ $1 Kg6 11.Rxb8 $18 ) 9.Rd8 Na6 10.Rd7+ Ke8 11.Ra7 Nb8 12.Ra8 {The knight returns to b8, where it is lost to a pin. Logical try on move 6, avoiding pawn capture, adds value to the study. But still the study is missing more highlights} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.hm Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "A. Avni"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "2k5/K1p1PN2/1P6/4r3/1r2N3/8/8/7B w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "15"] 1.Nc5 $1 Ra4+ $1 2.Na6 Rxa6+ 3.Kxa6 Re6 $1 4.Bc6 $1 ( 4.Bb7+ Kd7 ) 4...Rxe7 5.Bb7+ $1 Kd7 ( 5...Kb8 6.Nd8 $1 cxb6 7.Nc6+ ) 6.Bc8+ $1 Kxc8 7.b7+ Kb8 8.Nd8 $1 {A nice intermediate move 4.Bc6!, followed by Bb7 and then Bc8+! In the final position, the black rook is forced onto e7, which appears to be the only losing square on the board in original position. A short study, but almost every move contains some surprising element.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "1.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Gatti=D"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "8/1P6/2n4P/6pp/p7/P3p1pK/P3PbP1/7k w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "33"] 1.b8=Q $1 ( 1.h7 {Logical Try} 1...Nd4 $1 2.h8=Q Nxe2 $1 3.Qxh5 Nf4+ ) 1...g4+ 2.Kh4 Nxb8 3.h7 Nd7 4.h8=Q Kxg2 5.Kxh5 Kf1 6.Kxg4 g2 ( 6...Ne5+ 7.Qxe5 $1 g2 8.Qa1+ $1 Be1 9.Qf6+ $1 Bf2 10.Qa1+ {perpetual check} ) 7.Qh3 Ne5+ 8.Kf4 Nd3+ ( 8...Ng6+ 9.Ke4 Nh4 10.Kd3 $1 Ke1 11.Qc8 $1 Kf1 12.Qh3 $1 Ng6 13.Ke4 ) 9.exd3 e2 10.Kf3 $1 e1=N+ 11.Ke4 Ke2 12.Qg4+ Kd2 13.Qf4+ Ke2 14.Qg4+ Kf1 15.Qh3 Nc2 16.d4 $1 Ne3 17.Kd3 {Positional draw. Black threatens, after …Nd4, to mate the white king or win material, but White finds a way to avoid this. After a few moves, Black obtains very dangerous pawns against the white queen. I like that the play is largely forced for both sides, with minor promotions appearing in both the main line and the variations. There seems to be rather a long introduction before move 7, but on closer inspection one sees that even the first move - and White’s fifth move - are important. The study ends in a positional draw. Still, despite its merits, I feel that something is missing to justify a higher award.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "2.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "O.Pervakov"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "8/8/7Q/8/2prbK2/8/5k2/2n3N1 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "33"] 1.Nh3+ Ke1 $1 ( 1...Ke2 2.Ke5 $1 Nb3 3.Nf4+ Kd1 4.Ne6 Rd7 $1 5.Kxe4 c3 6.Ke3 Kc1 7.Qf6 $1 c2 8.Nc5 $1 Nxc5 9.Qa1# {Model mate} ) 2.Ke3 $1 Ne2 $1 3.Qh4+ Kd1 4.Nf2+ Kc1 $1 5.Nxe4 Ng3 $3 6.Qg5 $3 Rxe4+ 7.Kf3+ Kb2 8.Qxg3 c3 $1 9.Qb8+ Ka3 $1 10.Qc8 $3 ( {Thematic try} 10.Qc7 $2 Rb4 $1 11.Ke3 Kb2 12.Qe5 Rh4 $1 13.Kd3 Rh3+ 14.Kc4 Rh4+ $11 ) ( {Thematic try} 10.Qd6+ $2 Rb4 $1 11.Ke3 Kb3 12.Kd3 c2 13.Qc5 Rd4+ $1 14.Kxd4 Kb2 15.Qc3+ Kb1 16.Qb3+ Ka1 17.Qxc2 $11 {Stalemate} ) 10...Rb4 $1 11.Ke3 Kb2 12.Qh8 $1 {The key} 12...Rg4 ( 12...Rb6 13.Qd4 $1 Rh6 14.Kd3 Rh3+ 15.Kc4 $18 ) 13.Qb8+ Kc2 14.Qh2+ $1 Kb3 15.Kd3 Rd4+ $5 16.Kxd4 c2 17.Qd2 {There are few stages in the study, the introduction is not so connected to the end. We have some nice and surprising moves during different stages. Queen vs Rook and pawn seems for me little boring , it is too well known. There are some original elements in this endgame, but most of ideas are well known} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "3.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Nick DesMarais"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "1b6/8/k1p4P/p1Pp3p/P6P/3K1P2/5P2/8 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "21"] 1.Kd4 $1 Bf4 2.h7 Bh6 3.h8=B $3 ( 3.h8=Q $2 Bg7+ 4.Qxg7 {stalemate} ) 3...Bc1 ( 3...Kb7 4.Be5 $1 Bf8 5.Bf6 $1 Kc7 6.f4 Kd7 7.f5 Ke8 8.Bg5 ) 4.Kd3 $1 Bf4 ( 4...Bh6 5.Be5 ) 5.Bf6 $1 ( 5.Bc3 Bc7 6.Ke3 Kb7 7.f4 Kc8 8.f5 Kd7 ) 5...Bc7 ( 5...Kb7 6.Bd8 $1 Be5 7.f4 $1 Bxf4 8.Bxa5 $18 ) 6.f4 ( 6.Bg5 Kb7 7.f4 Kc8 8.f5 Kd7 ) 6...Bxf4 7.Bg5 $1 Bc7 ( 7...Bxg5 8.hxg5 h4 9.g6 h3 10.g7 h2 11.g8=Q h1=Q 12.Qa8# ) 8.f4 Kb7 9.f5 Kc8 10.f6 Kd7 11.f7 $18 {Interesting, but not new bishop promotion, but big part of the study is too technical. I like the winning tempi move 6.f4} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "4.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Yehuda Hoch"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "B1k4K/2p4N/1P6/1pP5/8/P1P5/2P5/2n3q1 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "34"] 1.b7+ Kb8 2.Nf8 Qh1+ 3.Kg7 Qd5 $1 4.c6 $1 ( 4.Kf6 Qd8+ 5.Kf7 c6 $19 ) 4...Qxc6 5.Kf7 $1 {otherwise Qd6 and Qd8 wins} 5...Ne2 6.Ke7 $1 Qd6+ 7.Ke8 Qxf8+ ( 7...Qe5+ 8.Kd8 Qg5+ 9.Ke8 Qg8 10.Ke7 Qg7+ 11.Ke8 Qe5+ 12.Kd8 {gives nothing to black} ) ( 7...Nxc3 8.Nd7+ Qxd7+ 9.Kxd7 $10 ) 8.Kxf8 Nxc3 9.Ke7 Nb1 10.Ke6 ( 10.Kd7 Nxa3 11.Kc6 b4 12.Kc5 Nxc2 13.Kc4 c5 ) 10...Nxa3 11.c3 $1 Nb1 12.Kd5 Nxc3+ 13.Kc5 c6 14.Kxc6 $1 b4 15.Kc5 b3 16.Kb4 b2 17.Ka3 b1=Q {Stalemate. The final stalemate is known from many studies, but the long preceding line with different motifs, including locking the bishop on the first move added value to the study} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "5.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "M. Prusikin & B. Faynshteyn"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2006.08.07"] [FEN "K1k5/2pN2PP/P7/3p4/8/2bP3q/1r6/1B6 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "20"] 1.d4 $1 Bxd4 2.Bf5 $3 Qxf5 ( 2...Bxg7 3.Bxh3 Kd8 4.Nc5 $11 ) 3.Nb6+ $3 Rxb6 ( 3...cxb6 4.h8=Q+ Kd7 5.Qf8 Qe6 6.g8=Q Qc6+ 7.Kb8 Be5+ 8.Ka7 Qc7+ 9.Ka8 Qc6+ $11 ) 4.h8=Q+ Kd7 5.Qc8+ $1 Kxc8 6.g8=Q+ Kd7 7.Qc8+ $1 Kxc8 8.a7 Rb8+ 9.axb8=Q+ Kd7 10.Qc8+ $1 Kxc8 {White tries to force stalemate, Black tries to avoid it. White sacrifice all pieces, including 2 promoted pawns. White king stays from start in a8 corner square. Not enough to place it higher then commendation level.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Pavel Arestov"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "1kbr4/8/2P5/1K3R2/1n6/3Np3/8/8 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "18"] 1.c7+ $1 Kxc7 2.Rc5+ $1 Nc6 $1 3.Rxc6+ Kb7 4.Rb6+ $1 Ka7 5.Nb4 $1 Rd5+ $1 6.Nxd5 e2 7.Nb4 $1 Bd7+ $1 8.Ka5 $1 e1=Q 9.Rb7+ $1 Kxb7 {Model stalemate with pin of Nb4. Not much added to many studies with similar stalemate idea.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Daniel Gatti"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "3k4/Bp2p3/1P1pP3/n2P1p2/p3pP1p/4K2P/8/5N2 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "59"] 1.Kd4 $1 a3 2.Ne3 a2 3.Nc2 Nb3+ 4.Kc3 a1=Q+ ( 4...Nc1 5.Kb2 Nd3+ 6.Ka1 Nxf4 7.Ne3 Nxh3 8.Nxf5 Nf4 9.Nxh4 e3 10.Nf3 Nd3 11.Ng1 Nc1 12.Nf3 e2 13.Ne1 Kc8 14.Kb2 {positional draw} ) 5.Nxa1 Nxa1 6.Bb8 $1 Kc8 7.Bc7 ( 7.Ba7 {thematic Try} 7...e3 8.Kd3 e2 9.Kxe2 Nc2 10.Kd3 Nb4+ 11.Kc4 Na6 12.Kb5 Kd8 13.Kc4 Ke8 14.Kb5 Kf8 15.Kc4 Kg8 16.Kb5 Nc5 17.Kc4 Ne4 18.Kd3 Nf6 19.Kd4 Kg7 {triangulation} 20.Bb8 Kf8 21.Bc7 Ke8 22.Bb8 Kd8 23.Ba7 Kc8 24.Kc4 Nh5 25.Kd4 Nxf4 $19 ) 7...e3 8.Kd3 e2 9.Kxe2 Nc2 10.Kd3 Ne1+ 11.Ke2 {11. Ke3 minor dual} 11...Ng2 12.Kf3 Ne1+ 13.Ke2 {13. Ke3 minor dual} 13...Nc2 14.Kd3 Nb4+ 15.Kc4 {15. Kd4 minor dual} 15...Na6 16.Kb5 $1 Nc5 17.Kc4 Ne4 18.Kd3 Ng3 19.Kd4 {20. Kd2 minor dual} 19...Nf1 20.Kd3 Ng3 21.Kd4 {21. Kd2 minor dual} 21...Nh5 22.Ke3 Nf6 23.Kd4 Ne8 {Knight cannot gain tempos, so tries the last option.} 24.Kc4 Nxc7 25.bxc7 Kxc7 26.Kb5 b6 27.Ka6 $1 b5 28.Kxb5 Kb7 29.Ka5 Ka7 30.Kb5 {Positional draw. Very long line, practically interesting endgame,pitty that several minor duals downgrade the study} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Yochanan Afek"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "k7/7R/8/B7/8/5K2/5RpP/7q w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "15"] 1.Ke2 $1 ( 1.Rxg2 Qf1+ 2.Rf2 Qd3+ ) 1...Qd1+ $1 ( 1...g1=N+ 2.Ke3 Nf3 3.Rc7 Kb8 4.Rc5 Nxh2 5.Bc7+ ) 2.Kxd1 g1=Q+ 3.Be1 $1 ( 3.Ke2 Qg4+ 4.Kf1 Qd1+ 5.Kg2 Qg4+ $11 ) 3...Qg4+ 4.Kc1 $1 Qg5+ 5.Rd2 Qe3 $1 6.Ra7+ $3 Kb8 ( 6...Qxa7 7.Rd8+ Kb7 8.Rd7+ $18 ) 7.Bg3+ $1 ( 7.Bf2 Qc3+ 8.Rc2 Qe3+ 9.Rd2 ( 9.Bxe3 {Stalemate!} ) ( 9.Kb1 Qc1+ 10.Kxc1 {Stalemate.} ) 9...Qc3+ 10.Kd1 Qb3+ {with perpetual check} ) 7...Kxa7 8.Bf2 {A variety of tactical motives. The move Ra7 is a nice double deflection, although the idea is known. I still like the play that arises around the position, with interesting variations , especially considering the relatively small number of pieces on the board.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Michal Hlinka & Lubos Kekely"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2024"] [FEN "1r3B2/3p4/1P3p2/8/2P1P2k/2P5/8/3K4 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "25"] 1.Bc5 Kg5 2.Kd2 $1 d6 ( 2...f5 3.Be7+ Kg4 4.c5 fxe4 5.Bd6 $18 ) 3.Be3+ $1 Kg6 4.Kc2 f5 5.Kb3 $1 f4 6.Bd4 $1 ( 6.Bf2 $2 Kf6 7.Kb4 Ke5 8.Kb5 Kxe4 9.Kc6 Kd3 $11 ) 6...Rf8 7.Kb4 f3 8.Bf2 $1 Kf6 9.Kb5 Ke5 10.Kc6 Rg8 11.b7 Kxe4 ( 11...Rb8 12.c5 dxc5 13.Bg3+ Kxe4 14.Bxb8 f2 15.Be5 f1=Q 16.b8=Q $18 ) 12.Kxd6 Kd3 13.c5 {White must play with great accuracy in both the main line and the additional line. However, I feel that some distinctive or special motifs are missing.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "Daniel Gatti"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "2n3k1/5p1p/3pP1p1/2pP4/2N1P1P1/Q1PP3P/2p2P2/1rBq1BK1 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "39"] 1.e7 Nxe7 2.Qa8+ Kg7 3.Bh6+ Kxh6 4.Qf8+ Kg5 5.Qxe7+ Kh6 6.Qf8+ Kg5 7.f4+ $1 ( 7.h4+ {Thematic Try} 7...Kxg4 8.Ne3+ Kh5 9.Qxf7 Qxf1+ 10.Nxf1 c1=Q $10 ) 7...Kxf4 8.Qxd6+ $1 Kg5 9.h4+ ( 9.Qe7+ Kh6 10.Qf8+ Kg5 11.h4+ Kxg4 12.Ne3+ Kh5 13.Qxf7 h6 14.Nxc2 Qg4+ 15.Kf2 Qxh4+ 16.Ke2 Qg4+ 17.Qf3 Qxf3+ 18.Kxf3 Rxf1+ 19.Ke2 Rf7 $3 20.d4 cxd4 21.Nxd4 Kg5 {Possible because wR is in f7 and not in f8} 22.e5 Re7 $1 23.e6 Kf6 $10 ) 9...Kxg4 10.Ne3+ Kh5 11.Qf4 ( 11.Qe5+ $2 f5 $1 ) 11...Qxf1+ 12.Nxf1 c1=Q 13.Qxc1 Rxc1 14.d6 Ra1 15.d4 $1 cxd4 16.c4 Ra8 17.c5 Kxh4 18.d7 {or first 18. c6} 18...Kg5 19.c6 Kf6 20.c7 {Long, interesting play. It looks like real game. White's position looks dangerous, so he starts counter-attack on black king. After some exchanges we finally get knight with 2 passed pawns vs rook endgame and black can't avoid promotion. Not type of studies we see frequently.Some of lines looks not so clear and include brutal exchanges. I was wondering how to rate this type of study, but even if the award for the study can't be very high, we can enjoy replaying it.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "László Antal (Hungary)"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "8/5p2/p7/p7/P7/1pk5/5P1P/1K6 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "33"] 1.f3 $1 ( 1.h4 Kd4 2.Kb2 Ke4 3.Kxb3 Kf5 $1 4.Kc4 Kg4 5.Kc5 Kxh4 6.Kb6 Kg4 7.Kxa6 Kf3 8.Kxa5 f5 9.Kb4 Kxf2 10.a5 f4 {position A} 11.a6 f3 12.a7 Kg1 13.a8=Q f2 $10 ) 1...Kd4 2.Kb2 Ke3 3.h4 Kf4 4.Kxb3 Kf5 5.Kc4 Kg6 6.Kc5 Kh5 7.Kb6 Kxh4 8.Kxa6 Kg3 9.Kxa5 Kxf3 10.Kb4 f5 11.a5 f4 {compared to position A in the 1.h4 line, the black king is on f3 rather than f2.} 12.a6 Ke2 13.a7 f3 14.a8=Q f2 15.Qg2 Ke1 16.Kc3 f1=Q 17.Qd2# {f3 and Black is in zugzwang - is the only interesting point. We see this type of position in many studies,the rest is also very common. But still - a long logical try of interest for practical players, convinced me to award this study.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp.c Variantim"] [Site ""] [Date "2025"] [Round ""] [White "D.Gurgenidze & V.Tarasiuk"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025"] [FEN "B7/3q4/8/pR1n3P/4p3/p1P5/2K1k3/4Nb1R w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "21"] 1.Rh2+ $1 Ke3 2.Rxd5 Qa4+ 3.Kc1 $1 a2 4.Rxa2 $1 Qxa2 5.Nc2+ Kf4 $1 6.Rf5+ $1 Kxf5 7.Bd5 $1 Qa4 $1 8.Bc6 $1 Bb5 ( 8...Qa2 9.Bd5 {positional draw.} ) 9.Bxb5 Qa2 $1 10.Bc4 $1 Qa4 11.Bb5 {Positional draw. 2 rooks are sacrificed, one of them not in clean way. The idea was already seen before - Buyannemekh=B Hlinka=M, .hm Ceskoslovensky Sach 2019. See the next study for a more economical implementation without some of the technical problems.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "Variantim 2025"] [Site ""] [Date "2026"] [Round ""] [White "Gurgenidze & Tarasiuk modification: M. Pasman"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2026"] [FEN "8/1B6/8/pR5P/q3pk2/2P5/6R1/N1K2b2 w - - 0 1"] [SetUp "1"] [PlyCount "19"] 1.Rf5+ $3 Kxf5 2.Nc2 $1 Ke5 3.Rg5+ $1 Kf4 4.Rf5+ $1 {second rook sacrifice on same square} 4...Kxf5 5.Bc6 $1 Qa2 6.Bd5 Qa4 7.Bc6 Bb5 8.Bxb5 Qa2 9.Bc4 Qa4 10.Bb5 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard