www.arves.org - Israel Ring Ty 2005-2006

Studies awarded for the Israel Ring tournament 2005-2006.

[Event "1.p Israel Ring 2005-06"] [Site ""] [Date "2008.11.10"] [Round ""] [White "A.Grinblat & H.Aloni"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "7N/P5N1/P2Ppk1p/p6b/r4B1P/1pP1K2P/Pp1P4/8 b - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "28"] [SourceDate "2005.01.24"] 
 1... Re4+ $1 2. Kxe4 b1=Q+ 3. Kd4 $1 (3. d3 $2 Qh1+ 4. Ke3 Qf3+ $19) 3... Qg1+ 4. Be3 Qxg7 $1 (4... e5+ 5. Kc5 Qh1 6. Nxh5+ Ke6 7. axb3 Qd5+ 8. Kb6 Qxb3+ 9. Kxa5 Qa3+ 10. Kb5 $1 Qb3+ 11. Kc5 $1 Qd5+ 12. Kb4 $1 Qxd6+ 13. Bc5 Qxa6 14. c4 {and wins, because Black has no resources for protection against defeat as the Queen should control a8}) 5. a8=Q b2 (5... bxa2 6. Qe4 $1 Qg3 7. d7 Qd6+ 8. Kc4 e5 9. Bd4 $1 exd4 10. Qxd4+ Qxd4+ 11. cxd4 a1=Q 12. d8=Q+ Kg7 13. Qe7+ Kxh8 14. Qe5+ Kg8 15. Qxh5 $18) 6. Qb8 $1 (6. Kc5 $2 b1=Q 7. Bd4+ e5 8. a7 Qgb7 $1 $17) 6... b1=Q 7. Qxb1 Qa7+ 8. Kc4 Be2+ $1 9. d3 $1 Bxd3+ $3 (9... Qxa6+ 10. Kc5 Qc8+ 11. Kb5 $1 Qb8+ 12. Bb6 Qxd6 13. Kxa5 $18) 10. Qxd3 (10. Kxd3 $2 Qh7+ $11) 10... Qxa6+ 11. Kc5 $3 (11. Kd4 $2 e5+ $19) 11... Qxd3 (11... Qa7+ 12. Kc6 $18) (11... Qc8+ 12. Kb5 $18) 12. Bd4+ $1 e5 13. d7 $1 Ke7 14. Nf7 $1 Kxd7 (14... exd4 15. d8=Q+ Kxf7 16. Qd5+ Ke7 17. cxd4 Qxh3 18. h5 a4 19. Kb6 Qh4 20. Kb5 a3 21. Qe5+ Kd7 22. d5 $18) 15. Nxe5+ $18 {The complex mechanism is constructed. Currently solution arise of the interesting combinational play. Decorate play a worthy moves: 1...Re4+!; 9...Bxs3!!, 11.Kc5!!} *

[Event "3.p Israel Ring 2005-06"] [Site ""] [Date "2006.09.20"] [Round ""] [White "S.Nahshoni"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "1n3Q2/3P2p1/p5p1/NP1p1p2/3p1Bk1/P5P1/P3rrP1/2K5 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "63"] [EventDate "2006"] [SourceDate "2005.01.24"] 
 1. Bd2 (1. Kb1 $5 Rb2+ $11) 1... Rxd2 (1... Nxd7 2. Qh8 $18) 2. Qe7 $3 (2. Nb3 $5 Rc2+ $19) 2... Rc2+ 3. Kb1 (3. Kd1 $5 Rcd2+ 4. Ke1 Rde2+ 5. Qxe2+ Rxe2+ 6. Kxe2 Nxd7 $11) 3... Rb2+ 4. Ka1 Rxa2+ 5. Kb1 Rab2+ 6. Kc1 Rbc2+ 7. Kd1 Rcd2+ 8. Ke1 Rde2+ 9. Qxe2+ Rxe2+ 10. Kxe2 Nxd7 (10... d3+ 11. Kd2 Nxd7 12. bxa6 Kxg3 13. a7 $1 Nb6 14. Kxd3 $1 (14. Nc6 $5 f4 $11) 14... Kxg2 {as in main line}) 11. bxa6 d3+ $1 12. Kd2 Kxg3 13. a7 Nb6 14. Kxd3 Kxg2 (14... f4 15. Kd4 Kxg2 16. Kc5 Na8 17. Kc6 $18) 15. Kd4 f4 16. Kc5 Na8 17. Kc6 (17. Kxd5 $2 f3 18. Nc4 f2 19. Nd2 f1=Q $11) 17... f3 18. Nb3 f2 19. Nd2 f1=Q 20. Nxf1 Kxf1 21. Kb7 d4 22. Kxa8 d3 23. Kb8 $1 d2 24. a8=Q d1=Q 25. Qh1+ Ke2 26. Qxd1+ Kxd1 27. a4 g5 28. a5 g4 29. a6 g3 30. a7 g2 31. a8=Q g1=Q 32. Qa1+ $18 {Now, it is clear why did white "insist" on basing Pa2 in the 4th move. The idea of destruction of a pawn is not fresh, but has interesting nuances. Excessively long solution is not so justified. Also, cannot welcome the heavy form of a study. It concerns other works as well...} *